ROMEO & JULIET (2013) movie review

Romeo-and-Juliet-2013I teach Romeo & Juliet to freshmen. So, how thrilled am I when a film does justice to a story and offers yet another visual option to help students connect with literature, especially their first taste of Shakespeare.

This version is beautiful. Filmed in the actual city of Verona in Italy, you feel transported by the orange-hued sunrises, the castled landscape, and the constant flavors in renaissance artwork layered on each backdrop.
_MG_9515.CR2
It’s visually perfect. Certainly Julien Fellowes, Downton Abbey writer, takes his literary liberties as screenwriter, allowing for a medieval tournament and fewer characters. He does, however, speed up the action and include scenes and characters rarely enjoyed in film versions. He is also somehow able to keep it clean (classroom appropriate) without losing the romantic heart of the play. I believe that Shakespeare himself would have approved of Fellowes’s translation.
_MG_6659.CR2Paul Giamatti, never before a favorite of mine, flawlessly endeared the Friar character and stole the show.
supportingcast-romeo-juliet-damian-natashaDamian Lewis (brilliant as Winters in Band of Brothers and currently starring  in tv’s Homeland) played Lord Capulet perfectly. His performance was unexpected and fresh. Hailee Steinfeld, the True Grit lovely, sweetened Juliet with youth and believability. The statuesque and stunning Douglas Booth played well the lovestruck son and heir Romeo.Romeo-and-Juliet

Any attempt at Romeo & Juliet begs a comparison.

Romeo-JulietThere is  no better teaching tool to offer freshmen boys than replacing swords with guns, an orchard below the balcony with a swimming pool, and awkward tights with khakis and Hawaiian shirts.  Baz Luhrmann‘s 1996 version with gorgeously brooding Fortune’s fool Leo and a pre-pubescent Claire Danes helps students relate and hear actual Shakespeare with modern connections. We scaffold to what we know, and suddenly learning is not a chore.Romeo-and-Juliet1

Most stage versions cast the couple too old, so it’s a hard sell in a classroom. Zeffirelli’s classic 1968 version, though prominent in schools and sporting a boastable Zac Efron look-alike as Romeo, is now nearly unrelatable to students who mock the forced lines, abundance of cleavage, and laughable characterizations.Fate-Shakespeare-Romeo-Juliet

The flaw in Fellowe’s version is that students will forget to treat it as an adaptation and No Fear Shakespeare will reign over actual script. Well, we shall all take a tip from Juliet in this and, “Look to like, if looking liking move, but no more deep endart my eye than your content gives strength to make it fly.”8643814882_c1e93bea0a_o

About these ads

3 Comments

Filed under Classic, Drama, Historical Drama

3 responses to “ROMEO & JULIET (2013) movie review

  1. jhosack87

    Thank you so much for this insightful review. I’m excited to see it!

  2. JUAN LEVIN

    Under my point of view the best versión filmed up to date from the shakesperian play was was filmed by FRANCO ZEFFIRELLI in 1968 with LEONARD WITHING and OLIVIA HUSSEY in the roles of Romeo and Juliet.The filming has had no flaws and I find it quite unbeatable.It will be very difficult to make a better versión.This 2013 versión doesnt reach even the heels of the Zeffirelli’s versión.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s